<?xml version="1.0"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Ansari Education and Research Society</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Journal of Ultra Scientist of Physical Sciences</journalTitle>
    <issn/>
    <eissn/>
    <publicationDate>April 2010</publicationDate>
    <volume>22</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <startPage>89</startPage>
    <endPage>94</endPage>
    <doi>jusps-A</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>1032</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">omination in bipartite graphs</title>
    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>V. Swaminathan (sulanesri@yahoo.com)</name>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Y.B. Venkatakrishnan (venkatakrish2@maths.sastra.edu)</name>
        <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
      </author>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Reader (Retd.) S.N. College, Madurai - 625 002 (INDIA)</affiliationName>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Mathematics, Tanjor - 613 402 (INDIA)</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">&lt;p&gt;Let &lt;em&gt;G= (X,Y,E,)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;be a bipartite graph. A subset &lt;em&gt;D&lt;/em&gt; of &lt;em&gt;X&lt;/em&gt; is an X-dominating set if every&lt;em&gt; x &amp;euro; X-D &lt;/em&gt;is X-adjacent to at least one vertex&amp;nbsp; u&lt;em&gt;&amp;euro; D&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;The cardinality of a minimum X-dominating set is called the X-domination number and is denoted by &lt;em&gt;Y&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; (G)&lt;/em&gt; . A minimum cardinality subset&amp;nbsp; S X which dominates all vertices in &lt;em&gt;Y&lt;/em&gt;, such a set is called Y-dominating set. The Y-domination number is denoted by &lt;em&gt;Y&lt;sub&gt;y&lt;/sub&gt; (G) &lt;/em&gt;We characterize graphs for which &lt;em&gt;Y&lt;sub&gt;y&lt;/sub&gt; (G) &lt;/em&gt;= &lt;em&gt;Y&lt;sub&gt;y&lt;/sub&gt; (G) &lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Y&lt;sub&gt;y&lt;/sub&gt; (G) =&amp;nbsp;Y&lt;sub&gt;y&lt;/sub&gt; (G) ,&amp;nbsp;Y&lt;sub&gt;hr&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;nbsp;(G) = I&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;and also prove &lt;em&gt;Y&lt;sub&gt;y&lt;/sub&gt; (G)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;le; Yx (G)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
</abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="html">https://www.ultrascientist.org/paper/1032/</fullTextUrl>
    <keywords>
      <keyword language="eng">Bipartite graphs</keyword>
    </keywords>
    <keywords>
      <keyword language="eng">X-dominating sets</keyword>
    </keywords>
    <keywords>
      <keyword language="eng">Y-dominating sets</keyword>
    </keywords>
    <keywords>
      <keyword language="eng">Hyper Y-dominating sets. </keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
</records>
